RESPONSE TO THE GOLDEN RULE-ONE OR MANY, GOLD OR strike (quotations paginate numbers from Inquiry: Questioning, reading, writing, second edition by Lynn Z. efflorescence and Edward M. White) In his essay, The sumptuousen Rule- One or Many, Gold or glance? Jeffrey Wattles discusses the many carnations of the universal regularization, Do to others as you want others to do to you, and its influence on the way we live. This general advice from the Gods anchor in almost alwaysy religion is under testing; Is the retrieve golden? In other words, is it worthy to be cherish as a persist of living or level(p) as the rule of living?(Inquiry, p#237, paragraph 10) As Wattles examines it further, he comes to the conclusion that while the gold Rule is superb guideline, it is no rule to live by. He reasons that while the Golden Rules recognition might be helpful, to live exclusively by it is folly, as the answer to life cannot be formulated in a mere rule, golden or not. Rather, to consider this rule found in so many cultures as a leap off point and elaborate or simplify as the specific situation requires. I was intrigued by his panorama on such a rudimentary rule that I use up never thought twice about. dapple good advice, I would have to agree that as a rule or as the rule, it doesnt hold up. I look at that a rule is invariably fallible when it comes to ethics and youre collapse off on your various(prenominal) sniff out of right and wrong. well-nigh writers have put the rule on a pedestal, broad the impression that the rule is sufficient for ethics in the mother wit that no one could ever go wrong by adhering to it or in the sense that all duties may be inferred from... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment