'Comparison Between Two Poems By Two Different Poets About London – Wordsworth and Blake Essay\r'

'William Blake and William Wordsworth’s poesys have influenced citizenry from all all over the world by the smacks that to each one of their poems have expressed, the business leader which the poems have of captivating the commentator’s heed and the variety of differences each of the poets have with each former(a) as surface as the different perspectives each poet sees the world.\r\nWilliam Blake as well as universe an typeface poet, was renowned for his artwork and for his engraving. With these clean random abilities and talents, Blake stone-cold creates a unique from of illustrated verse. Born on the twenty-eighth November 1757, as the son of a hosier, Blake grew up as a capital of the United Kingdomer and survived in capital of the United Kingdom for the majority of his flavor where intimately of his inspiration as an artist in both poetry and painting originated. Beginning his purport as a poet at an early get on with of twelve it is seen that Blak e was up to(p) to give and sight his assimilates of capital of the United Kingdom and its population as both a barbarian and as an adult. Much of his work symbolises religion as many forms of animals and other forms of species. His contradictory view on life with poems like; ‘the Lamb,’ and its other half ‘the Tyger,’ show life and feelings from different perspectives.\r\nWilliam Wordsworth was excessively an English poet who was the near signifi faecal mattert of English romantic poets. Born subsequent than Blake on 7th April 1770, he lived in a family of high status unlike Blake. He went to train at Saint John’s College where he was inspired by its places of scenic beauty in his poems. His have it away for his family in addition provoked him to write poems also, for framework the poem ‘To My Sister.’ Wordsworth never deepened his meanings of his poems as untold as Blake besides nevertheless did they show lack of depth.\r\n The original poem ‘London’ by William Blake tells us save that the poem is ab come forth London. It is obviously difficult to study any predictions regarding what the components of the poem are, but it enables the lecturer to conduct that it is a topic Blake considers precise seriously. The first bourne:\r\n‘I wander thro’ each charter’d street…’\r\nmore or less points bring out that the poem is in circumstance one of Blake’s experiences, as if he himself is telling a bosh in a lyrical sense. The enounces: ‘I wander…’ stand out very a good deal compared to the remaining realm of the groove. It gives the impression that the poem is a psycheal feeling of maybe angst or picture of the poet close to live in a metropolis such as London consisting of a mediocrely large population that at times it becomes overcrowded and mint are unable to withstand themselves from feeling the resembling depression as their neighbours would feel. Or perhaps, because of living in the city for so long Blake had witnessed the sadness of his confederate Londoners as the dustup:\r\n‘And mark in any face I see\r\nMarks of weakness, attach of woe…’\r\nindicate. The technique of which is considerable legal and a tactful approach employ by Blake so the subscriber does not suffer from boredom by usage of the invariable talking to. The pun of the repetitive word ‘mark’ or ‘marks’, means in the first parenthood it is employ, that Blake had noticed the emotions revealed by the Londoners’ faces and taken into account from indication in the second line the signs of weakness and woe that seemed to burden ‘every face’ he apothegm. His creativity of maybe exaggerating what he truthfully had seen also ‘marks’ the reader with the same weaknesses and woes that apprize felt by the people being set forth in the poem.\r\nThe next two verses become tear mastered more depressing and unfold into a heighten pessimistic view of London and its inhabitants. Blake still exaggerates his views on London, for example:\r\n‘every Man…’, ‘every infant’s…’, ‘every voice…’\r\nThis overemphasis of these nouns also brings out the resource of the scene about every person feeling what is said in the poem. However the most emphasis is on the line:\r\n‘The background forg’d manacles I hear.’\r\nThis is a good technique use by Blake as the word ‘manacles’ means a device for shackling the hands or nigh subject that confines or restrains. In this part of the poem however, Blake indicates that he hears ‘ judging forg’d manacles’ which in this poem signifies that he was plausibly being pinned down or handcuffed in his mind symbolising in a track a form of depression because of the unhappiness which he saw and he himself felt from the cries of men, and the cry of fear of infants and the voices of bans.\r\nThe tertiary verse continues the form of dramatic melancholy with the words:\r\n‘How the Chimney-sweeper’s cry\r\nEvery black’ning perform appals;’\r\nRefers to only one chimney sweep and not ‘every’ chimney sweep, as was the case at the beginning of the poem. Religion is brought into the poem here by references to the Church. However, these churches are portrayed as quite the foe to what we would probably expect in the twenty-first century. In this poem, Blake conveys them to appal the cry of the Chimney sweep preferably than show concern for the boy. Where it says ‘black’ning Church’, Blake could be trying to show that the churches were turning a wile eye to the suffering population of London as the colour black is usually associated with and symbolises death and hard- midriffedness in our society.\r\nThe remaining l ines of the third verse which draws attention to soldiers could impeach that Blake was trying to link together the suffering of people to the ‘S veritable(a) Year War’ which had affected expectant Britain greatly during Blake’s period. In this particular part of the verse, Blake indicates that maybe the number of people suffering extends to the outskirts and beyond London. The last lines of the verse:\r\n‘And in hapless soldier’s sight\r\nRuns in personal credit line down rook walls.’\r\nis a good use of imagery used by Blake. It is obvious that the blood, which runs down the Palace walls, is the blood of the dying or dead soldiers. The reason for this particular image is that Blake is trying to suggest that the blood being on the walls of the Palace is another way of conveying that the soldiers of the war had been the Palace’s responsibility and them dying had caused them to be guilty of their deaths and the blood horrifyingly rev eals this.\r\nThe last verse of the poem seems to portray a very enigmatic view to the reader. It brings the poem to a tense end. Words of destruction are used in this verse, for example:\r\n‘Blasts’ and ‘blights’. This verse tells more of a story than the other verses. It seems to depict the story of a young prostitute ‘a youthful prostitute’ who owns a child of whom she causes to cry and for this reason, as well as her ‘plagues’, which could indicate a sexually genetical disease, she cannot marry and so Blake uses the last words: ‘ spousals hearse’ showing that she has no chance in marriage ceremony because of her problems.\r\nThe poem written by William Wordsworth portrays a tout ensemble different view to that of William Blake. The poem is considerably starry-eyed and, unlike the disturbing story Blake was articulating, Wordsworth was giving a description or his account of London and the view with which he coul d write a poem with. As Wordsworth was a poet who was inspired to write poetry from his love of nature it seemed only a natural thing to do to write an account on what he saw of London while on a coach to France.\r\nThe main difference to Blake’s poem on London was Wordsworth’s opening line:\r\n‘EARTH has not anything to show more fair:’\r\nin which he seems also to exaggerate what he sees as Blake had but in a cherry-red manner. as Blake also had done, Wordsworth had used imagery about what he saw of London. He uses rich words to portray a more regal city than that of what Blake saw, for example:\r\n‘majesty,’ ‘glittering,’ ‘bright,’ ‘smokeless,’ ‘beautifully,’ and ‘mighty heart.’\r\nThe imagery that he used was:\r\n‘This City now doth, like a cut back….’ which indicates that like a dress on a woman fits well, the beauty of the City of London also fits the s cenery which Wordsworth saw. He had probable seen the City in the morning when everything had been quiet as the words:\r\n‘Ne’er saw I, never felt, a take root so deep!’ Many people across the world even in the time of Wordsworth would precisely ever refer to London as being calm.\r\nThe description of nouns and some by adjectives such as:\r\n‘Ships,’ ‘towers,’ ‘domes,’ ‘theatres,’ ‘temples,’ ‘smokeless air,’ and ‘river glideth,’ create a clam and overbold mood.\r\nThe poem is not so much created by the people who live in the City but only of what Wordsworth had seen which then makes the poem unreliable if the reader wants to find out about what the people who live in his poems are like.\r\nHe talks also to God about the splendours that he sees and how calm he seems to think London is.\r\n‘Dear God! The very houses seem asleep;\r\nAnd all that mighty heart is lyin g still!’\r\nThis indicates that Wordsworth may believe that London is a place where there is opportunity. In some cases this can be agreed but in others it just shows how much a look can deceive.\r\nThe poem which affected me most was the poem by Blake. The interesting parts of the difference of these poems were that they were written at different times, Blake’s before Wordsworth’s, and that they both punctuate on different things. Wordsworth’s poem even though very descriptive and managing to capture the reader’s imagination was not as effective as Blake’s because Blake showed more of an insight to London which many of us in our society would and depart never see.\r\nThe way in which he was able to tell the story of only a hardly a(prenominal) people’s lives yet it seemed it was happening to everybody was every bit effective. Hi use of imagery and puns made the reader think more about what he was feeling and how he was seeing Lon don more than Wordsworth’s poem. Another interesting perspective of these two poems was the fact that how much the view of a person living in London could differ so much from an outsider looking into the city.\r\n'