The Departed Analysis Essay Example for Free

The Departed Analysis EssayThe Departed is a film order by Martin Scorsese which won numerous gifts at the 79th annual Academy Awards. Scorsese has directed many films that bewilder won academy awards but he had never achieved the award for the best director. This changed with the 2006 release of The Departed and Scorsese got what he had ached for so many years. This film was indeed a film that I enjoyed watching. However it also got me thinking what piece ethical motive played in this blockbuster. During the beginning of the flick Jack Nichol news adopts Matt Damon and treats him like his own child.Damon wants to be a priest when he grows up. If youre a priest you most likely wont kill anyone even if it is for self defense because killing is a sin. However being the clever brainiac that Nicholson is asks Matt Damon when youre facing abrogate of a loaded barrel, what difference does it make? Nicholsons character, Frank Costello adopts Damons character, Sullivan mainly fo r personal intelligence purposes. He wants to have a mole in the SIU department like the government has moles in the Mafia families.The best person suitable for this job would be soul that you have raised as your own because the trust will always be there. Nicholson shows good ethics when he takes Damon under his wing. However as the movie progresses we find the true motive for the adoption. Nicholson wants someone who he can trust, that can keep him one step ahead of the law which is morally wrong. When Leonardo DiCaprios character Costigan is training for the job of a police officer he is denied the job due to his family ties to the Boston underworld. Costigan is really a good guy associate with a bad name.Vice versa Damon is a bad guy affiliated with a good name. Jobs shouldnt be lost because of someones family tie beam with certain groups especially if the person applying wants to change all that and has the knowledge and the will power to do so. I understand the phrase like father, like son but that isnt always necessarily true. The world is not just black and white it has shades of grey in it as well. Later in the movie we find that Frank Costello himself is a possible informant for the FBI and that he has recorded conversations of himself talking about illegal activities with Matt Damon.He has done this as a precaution incase the FBI indicts him in an even more serious case. If the FBI does indict him he will use the tapes as a leverage to explicate a reduced sentence or immunity. This is not very ethical because he adopted a son for his own freedom from government agencies. Towards the end of the movie it is really ironic that Jack Nicholson dies by what he told Damon so that he wouldnt become a priest. When youre facing the end of a loaded barrel, what difference does it make? Matt Damon was facing the loaded barrel of Nicholsons gun but Damon got to pull the trigger first.Because of Nicholsons bad ethics he got what he deserved by getting shot b y his own adopted son whom he used for pure personal safeguard from government agencies. In the final scene of the movie when Matt Damon is shot dead by Mark Wahlberg it was unethical of Wahlberg to shoot Damon. He should have collected evidence for a trial by a jury. However I think the murder was justified and fair for a better society. He could have played by the rules. But since Matt Damon didnt play by the rules why should Mark Wahlberg.