Criminal Justice System in Hong Kong Essay

AbstractThe paleness of the criminal rightness system in Hong Kong is bear on by different factors. Social disposition and public prognosis of the somebody in trial is one of the greatest factors. The somebodyality of the person in trial and the number of vital government connections that he or she has likewise affects the fairness of the justice system. Gener altogethery speaking, the justice system in Hong Kong is considered fair. This is true to almost all citizens not until a person in trial possesses a lot of connections, holds a great nap of fortune, and is a critical part in socio-political relations in Hong Kong or in the outside countries. Different factors range from social, political and other aspects.For an grievous job involving closing-making, we know that people relate in this aspect take on to make important, significant and intricate decisions in e genuinely part of their work. Today, it is very surprising to realize that a lot of try ons/adjudicators have write only a fraction of amount telling the moment of decision. This also includes the judgement process that they undergo each time they decide well-nigh a given subject.There are numerous reasons to think closely and reflect about this on-going silence. One of the most important reasons is that the declaratory system of judicial decision-making persuaded decision-makers to further believe that their personal role in the decision making is frame up to a minimal percent. The decision-makers role in reading our very own Constitution go away simply be a factor which declares about differentiated purposes.Correspondingly, in discovering many differentiated and far-flung laws to administer a case, the decision-maker is simply carrying out a straightforward industry of logical reasoning. The outcome of this process is not a entry of the judge. The creation of the decision came and grew out before the time the judge even thought about the person in trial.The thought of stereotypin g judges as to that being a purpose driven person or a propaganda administrator is not good. Somewhere in the middle of that range lead most in all probability produce judges which impart slowly display a fair degree of consistency. As we know, we can eer project that each case is different form the other and it is always low- take upon its own unique facts. These facts and truths will be found in the linguistic communication and social organization of the article and file that the decision-makers scrutinize.Because of this, we can always deny and resign any type of attitudinal philosophy. We, as rational human beings, can always seek to discern and determine diverse and differentiated styles and approaches. This of course greatly depends on whether the act in question concerns criminal violations, tax evasions, salary benefits or otherwise. In the process of analyzing different views about statutory construction, I have a great deal of certainty that there mustiness al ways be an explanation at a higher level of reasoning.Reasoning, decision-making, and implementation of statutory laws in Hong Kong are considered fair enough. The main structure of the criminal justice system in Hong Kong and the fairness of their decisions are affected by the following factors. First, political connections even a good judge will have difficulty in denying this factor. Political connections range from having a wide array of known people and having the full support of all the persons/groups. Second, social disposition a judge will most likely consider the social disposition of a defendant once he/she is in trial.If the conviction or the release of the said person will largely affect different sectors in the country especially the stinting sector then most likely the decision of the judge will be a little bit in favor to the defendant. Third, cash yes, money. Having a lot of money in Hong Kong changes everything. We, of course, are not assuming the fact that all judges in Hong Kong could be bought by money. coin plays an important role in the fairness of the justice system of Hong Kong by providing a possible loophole in the decision making. This idea need not to be discussed a lot because we all know that in directlys businesses and transactions, money is power. On the issue of having a fair justice system in Hong Kong, I do believe that they can understood be considered fair. This is because of the various external influences that they receive. But of course, the factors affecting the decision of the dialog box or judge are still very much resilient and pose a great amount of threat to the equality and fairness of the trial. Factors that affect the fairness of the justice system in Hong Kong are not confined to the topics that I have mentioned. These factors start from the individual himself and go beyond the usual factors like money, social disposition and government connections. Certain strategies put up by the defensive side will not be confined to just manipulating the decision but also the key persons involved in the whole proceedings. Hong Kong is a place of organized crime groups and sizeable people. I will leave all of these to your own imagination on how creative and clever these criminals and rich people might be in escaping possible guilty declarations.ReferencesForrester, R. B (1986). Law and the Loopholes. New Jersey. Aurora Publishing.